منابع مشابه
Informativeness and Moore’s Paradox∗
The first case is usually referred to as omissive and the second as commissive. What is traditionally perceived as paradoxical is that although such statements may well be true, asserting them is clearly absurd. An account of Moore’s Paradox is an explanation of the absurdity. In the last twenty years, there has also been a focus on the incoherence of judging or believing such propositions. In ...
متن کاملIndifference, neutrality and informativeness: generalizing the three prisoners paradox
The well-known Three Prisoners Paradox has been solved by Bayesian conditioning over the choice made by the Warder when asked to name a(nother) prisoner who will be shot. This paper generalizes the paradox to situations of N prisoners, k executions and m announcements made by the Warder. We also extend the consequences of hierarchically placing uniform and symmetrical priors (for example in the...
متن کاملInformativeness Constraints and Compositionality
In this paper we examine the role that compositional mechanisms and lexical semantics play in the determination of informativeness at the phrasal and clausal level. While the computation of the “relevance” of an utterance is largely determined by pragmatic factors (such as quantity), we argue that phrasal informativeness can, in many cases, be computed compositionally and independently of pragm...
متن کاملParadox and Relativism
Since the time of Plato, relativism has been attacked as a self-refuting theory. Today, there are two basic kinds of argument that are used to show that global relativism is logically incoherent: first, a direct descendent of the argument Plato uses against Protagoras, called the peritrope; and, second, a more recent argument that relativism leads to an infinite regress. Although some relativis...
متن کاملInformativeness, Relevance and Scalar Implicature
1. Introduction The main topic of this paper is the phenomenon of scalar implicature. Typical examples are given in (1)-(4): (1) a. Bill has got some of Chomsky's papers. b. The speaker believes that Bill hasn't got all of Chomsky's papers. (2) a. There will be five of us for dinner tonight. b. There won't be more than five of us for dinner tonight. (3) a. X: I like Mary. She's intelligent and ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Analysis
سال: 2008
ISSN: 0003-2638,1467-8284
DOI: 10.1093/analys/68.1.46